Socialism v. Tribalism

Different forms of Collectivism.

We have been in full Neo-marxist/communist immersion for the past few days, on various U.S. military bases in Okinawa, Japan. The question of whether the mode of collectivism we promote account for socialism therefore has arisen. 

There are fundamental differences in the collectivism advocated under tribal doctrine and ideology, in contrast to the collectivism advocated by Socialism/Marxism/Communism. I go go on and on with endless explanations and theories. However, it can be summarized quickly in a very basic way.

In socialism, the individual is erased and encouraged to remain at best mediocre and only exists to benefit from others through collectivism. 

In tribalism, the individual is sacred and encouraged to be the best he can be and exists to benefit others through collectivism. 

In practice, you can see the definition of socialism in America (and U.S. military bases). Degeneracy is promoted, individual rights and choices are eliminated and handed over to the state, and a diversity of losers are all about benefiting from the work and achievements of others, without themselves contributing to society outside of useless pathetic virtue signaling. 

On the other hand, here in our culture, we promote performance, competition and excellence. The individual as a warrior is sacred, his personal choices respected, with minimal involvement in his life from the state. The warrior also greatly contributes to the homogeneous tribe and is focused on helping his bros through his own achievements.

Socialism v. Tribalism. Quite a difference.